AV: Where did your love of music come from and when was it that you realized that music was going to become a major part of your life?
TG: It's hard to say exactly where it came from. My mom tells the story that when I was about 5 I asked for violin lessons. I think maybe I had just seen something on TV that made me ask that. But whatever it was, something must have resonated internally. Since we already had a piano I wound up taking piano lessons for 5 or 6 years, and did try violin for maybe a year and a half as well, but eventually hated having to go to lessons and practice while my friends were outside playing. I quit and for a few years had no music in my life, only to then start playing electric guitar in high school. It was actually in a high school career class where they were asking us what we wanted to do with our lives that I first had the thought of trying to do music for a living.
AV: What was it that your studies at the Berklee College of Music brought to your pursuit of music in your life?
TG: Berklee was and still is a big influence on my music and my career.
On the music side, I think Berklee gave me a good sense of harmony and melody. We spent so much time working on things like ear training, harmony classes, and (on guitar) scales and chord forms that part of the end result for me was to have a pretty good connection between the musical ideas in my head and my instruments. I think their approach is great for giving musicians that connection, but also a deeper understanding of things like chord progressions and tone tendencies in melodies and chords. I've noticed over the years that graduates of comparable schools to Berklee sometimes seem to have more "chops" on their instruments (technical prowess, speed, etc) than Berklee students, but Berklee students seem to have more depth to their music somehow. That's a broad generalization of course, but in my own experience there I definitely spent way more time working on harmony, ear training, and knowledge of the guitar's musical layout than I did working on instrument technique.
On the career side, being in the Berklee environment, with over 3000 other musicians from all over the world really opened my eyes to what it really takes to make it. I think no matter how big a fish you can become in the little pond of your home town, when you enter into that community you will always suddenly feel small again. Music has so many facets that no matter how good you might be at one of them, there's probably somebody there that's better at it.. but even if that's not true, there are definitely people better in other ways.
Berklee also continues to be a good resource for me as they maintain a fairly active association of alumni in southern California. I have a lot of good friends I've met through Berklee channels who do all kinds of things in the industry.
AV: Before you discovered the Chapman Stick what were you planning to do once you had obtained your degree and moved out into the non academic world of music?
TG: I think my main interest was always in writing music; to try to create something unique. I think as I was leaving Berklee I thought that teaching would probably be my main source of income, at least for awhile. As a guitar player, I was always looking for band situations too. The thought of really doing solo performances never really inspired me. So for a time I did just that. I taught guitar privately and at a local college and high school, while playing and writing in an original pop/rock group.
When that group fell apart, I had just discovered the Stick. In fact, the Stick might have even had something to do with the group breaking up, since it was too exotic for them and frankly I was too new at it, but kept trying to make it fit anyways. Once things split up though I had nothing in the way of me diving full time into the Stick. About a year later I started doing solo shows on it and had put together the group Agent 22.
AV: Many musicians that I talk to in the ambient/new age field have had no formal training when it comes to the music that they compose. What are the pros and cons you've seen in your career of having a formal background when it comes to composing new and original music?
TG: I honestly don't think there are any cons at all. Having a formal education in music is like having a well stocked tool box before building a house. It still takes creativity to build something original, but the tools help you reach your vision. You can't really teach creativity, but you can teach a lot of techniques to help support it.
Obviously there are lots of creative people in the world who never formally studied what they do. And in music, there are many such people who probably have an understanding of harmony and musicianship that's equal to or better than any music school graduate's. The more anyone works on their craft, the better they get at it, whether they have formal names for things or not. Formal studies to me seem like a short cut though. They give you a certain set of skills much more quickly than if you happen to pick them up along the way.
I can usually tell by listening to other writers' work whether they have a formal background or not. Usually it seems like the studied writers have a little more control over things like harmony, harmonic motion and development. "Unschooled" ears may have an advantage sometimes in that they can stumble onto unusual and beautiful harmonies or progressions that maybe a trained ear might not have gone to right away. But the trick is then.. where does that idea go?
How does it develop? That's where one's personal musical "toolbox" comes into play. The studied, or perhaps unschooled but well experienced ear has a lot of solid techniques to develop musical ideas. An unschooled and not as experienced ear may have a harder time.
AV: From your bio it sounds like you were already seeking new ways to express your musical inclinations by the time you were leaving Berklee. What was it that you were looking for in regards to the music that you composed and played that you were not already finding with the guitar?
TG: As I said, I think my main interest in music has always been in writing, and in trying to develop a unique voice as a writer. I love the guitar. In many ways it is a more expressive instrument that the Stick. But it is also an instrument with an incredibly developed history. As I wrote on guitar, post-Berklee, I struggled to come up with material that didn't somehow sound derivative. At my best, I'd developed a style that was something like a mix of Andy Summers, Pat Metheny, Eric Johnson and maybe a little bit of Joe Satriani. It was different than any of them.. but I could still hear the influences.
When I first heard the Stick everything about it was different. It was impossible to make it play the same patterns as a guitar, or a bass, or even a piano. It instantly gave me a new world to explore with far less history behind it.
AV: I think that first off we should define the Chapman Stick for the readers out there who may not already be familiar with this instrument. What makes this a unique instrument as compared to the guitar which was your instrument of choice for quite a number of years?
TG: The Chapman Stick was developed by musician Emmett Chapman in the early 70's. Emmett was originally a jazz guitar player and came up with the idea that you could play guitar by "tapping," that is.. sounding notes by striking the strings directly on the fretboard with your finger tips. He started playing guitar this way in 1969, but by 1974 had developed an instrument around the technique. The instrument I play is technically called a "Grand Stick" and has 6 guitar strings and 6 bass strings. The guitar side is tuned in ascending 4ths; almost (but not quite) like a conventional guitar. The bass side (played usually with the left hand) is a totally different animal though. It's actually tuned in reverse 5ths, something like an upside down cello. This unusual tuning arrangement mixed with the ability to play notes in both hands at the same time adds up to a musician being able to play bass lines, chords and melodies simultaneously.
It also means that almost all of the patterns I was used to playing on guitar were gone. The instrument also comes standard with separate pickups for the guitar and bass halves, meaning you can have two different sounds going at once. On mine I also have a MIDI pickup on the guitar side which allows me to dive into the entire world of synthesizers and have three sounds coming out at the same time.
AV: When you discovered the Chapman Stick it pushed you into some "soul-searching" in regards to what you wanted to put your musical abilities towards. Tell me about why this instrument was able to make you re- evaluate your career goals.
TG: More than anything I think it just really got me excited about music again. Not that I was ever really "unexcited," but it was something new and different and that was just what I'd been looking for. I also found it to be a much better instrument to write music on than guitar. Having the ability to play bass, chords and melody at the same time allowed me to instantly explore melody/harmony relationships in a way that is much more difficult on guitar. As a writer, it really gives you what a piano gives you; a mini-orchestra under your fingers. Because of that it also works incredibly well as a solo instrument, so once I had enough material together it was easy to start performing regularly.
The "soul-searching" part of things was really in setting aside the guitar to work on the Stick. I'd invested about 10 years or so in getting proficient on it, and as I started investing a lot of time learning the Stick I could tell my physical skills on guitar were getting rusty. They really are very different instruments. It was scary for awhile as I really hit a point where I was not yet very good at my new instrument, but my skills on my old instrument were fading, not to mention the fact that having been out of college for a few years at that point, it was well past time to be trying to earn a living with the skills I had. Somehow through that period though I just felt I was doing the right thing, regardless of what it looked like at that moment, and that somehow it was all going to lead to a happy ending.. which after about a year or two it did.
AV: I'm sure that the Chapman Stick required a whole new approach than say an electric guitar. Tell me about how you approached the study of this instrument and how you were eventually able to master this unique 12 string instrument?
TG: I found myself with three major hurdles in switching from the guitar to the Stick. First, half of the instrument was tuned in a pattern I more or less recognized from guitar, but.. it was set up to be fretted with the right hand instead of the left. Second, my left hand, which was used to being on a fretboard had a whole new tuning to learn. And third, and probably most difficult, there was the left and right hand independence which was totally new to me. It took me about a year and a half of spending 25 or more hours a week on it to be able to play about an hours worth of music.
AV:
When was it that you actually started
to work on the music that was to become A Whisper
in the Thunder?
TG: Actually, a few of the pieces
date back as far as perhaps 2000. I know that the original
lineup of my group Agent 22 had performed 77 Times and
Jungle (pt 1) a few times back then. In fact, most of
the material had been in my live solo repertoire for
some time, and I think it benefited greatly from that.
Performing it before recording it not only allowed me
to get more comfortable playing it, but also gave the
material a chance to grow and evolve in an almost organic
way.
To give an example; the original live version of
the piece "Jungle" was just what I came
to label on the CD as "part 1." Right where
the track ID for part 2 comes in, the piece used to
stop. But I always had a sense it should continue into
something else. Live it used to fall into a moment of
free improvisation, but eventually out of that something
of a new structure started to evolve. It was a slow
process, just slight changes and new ideas from time
to time spread throughout performances, but eventually
there was a "part 2." Interestingly,
the way I eventually recorded "part 2" was
different than how I was and still am playing it live.
Similar in feel and texture, but with different themes
and form.
AV:
Do you have a routine or a process that you go
through when you are composing music for a new project?
TG: There is no real structured
routine. I tend to just look for any new idea that captures
my attention enough for me to spend time working with
it. It could be a melodic fragment, a rhythmic pattern
or chord progression or maybe a new sound. I think every
piece I've ever written probably has at least one such
"seed." Not every new idea is strong enough
to hold my attention for long, but when one does, I
usually try to listen internally and see how it wants
to develop.
This is where I think my musical training is a big
help. If I hear or feel where an idea might go, usually
I have an idea of how to take it there. It's almost
as if the music itself knows where it wants to go, but
is asking for directions. If its asking to go to a place
I know how to get to, things can fall into place pretty
easily. If instead it wants to go somewhere I've never
heard of, things may be a bit more of an effort, but
I still know how to at least find the right maps. Some
pieces evolve more under the fingers, others more in
the studio.
AV:
For the music on A Whisper in the Thunder did
you have a theme that flows through the entire work
and if so how does that effect the type of compositions
that you write?
TG: Actually, there is a conceptual
theme that ties the album together but it came after
most of the music was written. As I said, most of the
material came from things I'd been playing live for
awhile. I still have a big back log of material I play
live that I haven't recorded yet. When I started getting
serious about recording AWITT I probably had enough
pieces for two or three albums. So it was first a question
of "which pieces feel ready to record?" and
then out of those "which fit together into a theme?"
From there I put together a few new pieces like
Ahab, A Tiny Whispering Sound and The Frozen Ocean to
kind of tie things together and solidify the idea. It's
hidden among the song titles and moods, but I've actually
never described it in print and have just kind of left
it out in the world on its own to see what (if anything)
people make of it.
AV:
You enlisted some strong collaborator instrumentalists
for A Whisper in the Thunder in the persons of Jerry
Marotta, Pat Mastelotto and The California Guitar Trio.
Tell me about your relationships with these musicians
before your project and about the music that they created
on their own.
TG: Jerry of course I have an
ongoing project with. We tour regularly as a duo called
simply "Marotta/Griesgraber." I've been a
fan of his for some time, and met him when I got to
open for Tony Levin's Band here in Southern California.
We've actually done a whole album together as a group
that will be released next year.
The California Guitar Trio are very good friends,
and I'm a big fan of their music. I've been fortunate
to get to open for several of their US tours and have
done over 80 shows with them to date.
Pat Mastelotto I met through the California Guitar
Trio. He like Jerry is someone I've been a fan of for
awhile. They have fairly different musical personalities
which was a great resource for me in shaping the music.
You asked about the "music they created on their
own?" I'm guessing by that you mean their past
histories? If so, that could fill volumes, but..
Jerry is best known for having played with Peter
Gabriel for about 10 years. He kind of started his career
as a pocket/groove player with bands like Orleans and
then with Peter got more into orchestration, and unusual
parts. Those two things to me are really his specialties.
He has an incredible knack for thinking about drums
almost like instruments in an orchestra. Every piece
of the kit has a special part to play. No one is really
on "auto pilot." Along the same lines, he's
amazing at layering parts from Taos drums (native american
drums), and all sorts of percussion. He's been incredibly
in demand as a session player for decades having worked
with a dizzying list of people like Paul McCartney,
the Indigo Girls, Tears for Fears, Suzanne Vega, Sara
McLachlan, Elvis Costello, Robert Fripp, David Sylvian
and many others.
The California Guitar Trio formed out of the League
of Crafty Guitarists and Robert Fripp's "Guitar
Craft" courses. Even from their inception they
had a wild set of influences, including Bert Lams' love
of classical guitar, Hideyo Moriya's passion for surf
guitar and Paul Richard's interest in rock and jazz.
They tour relentlessly around the globe and have released
many great albums. They play with an unusual tuning
that greatly expands the guitar's range and have the
ability to really make three guitars sound like one
big "super- guitar." In their own shows, they
do mainly original music, but it's probably best described
by mentioning the range of material they play as covers.
It can include surf guitar, spaghetti westerns, King
Crimson, Yes and Queen covers, traditional Japanese
music and Beethoven symphonies.
Pat is probably best known for having worked with
King Crimson for over ten years now. He like Jerry also
has a very hefty discography which also includes people
like Mr Mister, The Rembrandts and XTC.
Pat to my ears anyways has a little bit of a different
feel than Jerry. He's maybe a little more aggressive,
though still way in a pocket. He also has a great sense
of orchestration with percussion but has a different
set of instruments he uses. One of his real specialties
is electronic drums and percussion. He actually sent
me a list by e-mail of everything he played on the tracks
he played on. It was such an amazing list we printed
the whole thing in the CD booklet.
AV:
How did you communicate your ideas for this new
CD to your collaborators and what kinds of input did
they have to the finished product?
TG: I really just let them do
what they do best. With musicians this good, I think
it's always best to at least listen to what their initial
ideas are. Maybe I would start them off with a rough
form of when to play and when not to play as well as
a feel suggestion. In some cases, like with Pat they
gave me a host of ideas and options to choose from.
Some pieces like Ahab and Jungle could literally be
re- orchestrated and re-mixed several different ways,
probably enough to have a whole album of just variations
of those two pieces. In the end though, it was
left to me to sort out exact arrangements and how things
would be mixed together.
AV:
Once things got under way in the studio how did
you and your collaborators mesh musically? Any problems
or surprises that had to be worked out?
TG: The blending was very natural.
As I said, they are all amazing musicians and have made
careers out of playing the right parts for a given piece.
Some small things did change on my end though, but that
too was fairly easy since aside from drums, I was covering
almost all the other parts. There were no egos to bruise
if a certain part needed to change to better fit what
the drums were adding.
One thing I did learn was that it was best for the
feel of the rhythmic pieces if I actually went back
in and re-recorded everything once the drums were in
place. That made for a long process, because essentially
it meant I had to record the album twice. The first
time through was just myself and a click track. So essentially
Pat and Jerry would wind up playing to the complete
album, minus the drums. Pat's engineer found it amusing
that we were "overdubbing" drums, but also
said they enjoyed the process. In a more traditional
setup, drummers often get little or nothing to play
to. Things usually start with their parts. In this case
though I was giving them almost the finished product
to work with. So to them it was fun I think to really
hear where the piece was going. All drummers have different
time feels though, and guys like Pat and Jerry are masters
of establishing grooves that may be intentionally off
the click a bit in a subtle way. Jerry especially likes
to play pretty laid back sometimes. It's an incredible
feel, but since I'd been playing to the harsher feel
of the straight on click, it meant I either had to edit
my parts to the drums or replay things to them instead
of the click. I chose the later to try to give things
the most natural "real" feel possible, even
though as I said it meant basically re-recording the
entire album.
Having CGT involved was great too. They really work
as one unit. The three of them have played together
for so long that as soon as one person would get a good
idea going, the other two would just naturally fill
in around it. It was wonderful to hear. Bert Lams especially
came up with some great contrapuntal lines to the melodies
I was playing. They also surprised me a little by doing
one of their "trademarked" circulations at
the end of the track Victor's Chase too. Circulations
come from Guitar Craft, and it's where each guitar player
only plays one note at a time, and they pass a melody
around the group in succession. Sometimes they're written
and sometimes they're improvised. At the end of Victor's
Chase, the Trio improvised a melody over the bass groove
and wall of drums and percussion supplied by both Jerry
and drummer Darren DeBree (Agent 22). Since three
people were improvising one melody, it tends to leap
and turn in ways one person would probably never come
up with. It has a real searching quality to it which
was perfect for the end of that piece. We also
did some interesting panning of their three guitars
for it that make for an interesting listen on headphones.
AV:
How long did it take for you to put the finishing
touches on this CD and were all of you that were involved
with this project happy with the final results?
TG: Once all the tracking was
done, the mixing and mastering were a pretty quick process.
I think it all happened in about 4 weeks. I generally
set up each piece and set the levels how I heard them,
and then Howard Givens (Spotted Peccary engineer) came
in and did all kinds of fine tuning to them. Everyone
was definitely happy with it. As I described though,
usually when people were contributing to it, they were
already hearing more or less the final product so there
weren't many surprises for them after the fact.
AV:
O3E is a subsidiary imprint of Spotted Peccary
Music and is the label that A Whisper in the Thunder
was released on. How did it come about that your CD
was the first on this new imprint of Spotted Peccary
and is your music a new direction for Spotted Peccary
or an expanding of its vision?
TG: I think they had been toying
with the idea of branching out for some time. The idea
behind O3E is that it will encompass many other types
of instrumental music, from progressive rock, to unusual
modern classical music, but always with I think the
same awareness of space and orchestration that typifies
the normal Spotted Peccary offerings.
I've actually been involved with Spotted Peccary
in various ways for a few years now, starting back around
the time they released the Martin/Klamt/Rownd album
"Convergence." I didn't play on the album,
but once they released it, the trio started doing some
shows regionally and invited me to play with them. It
was a lot of fun being (if you will) something of a
"5th Beatle" and just kind of adding parts
and textures to what they were doing. I think from that
point on, the idea of me doing an album for Spotted
Peccary was in everyone's minds, but since my music
is naturally a bit different than most of their offerings,
they felt it would be a good launching point for the
new imprint.
AV:
I'm sure this is a standard question but how has
the new CD been doing for you since its release last
October? What kind of feedback from listeners, reviewers
and broadcasters have you been getting?
TG: Actually I don't think that's
a very standard question at all! It's a funny thing,
but as the artist, it seems like all I ever hear is
good reviews and feedback. I'm sure like anything in
life what I do is not for everyone, but the only people
who seem to write about it or especially write to me
about it are the ones who really enjoy it.
One of the interesting things has been to see it
get accepted by people in many different walks of life
and reviewers and broadcasters in several genres. To
date I know its been played by a range of stations that
includes ambient, progressive rock, traditional jazz
and even talk radio. My fan base is likewise all
over the map. I can see a lot of middle aged people
at shows, some senior citizens, but then also college
age and even high school kids sometimes.
Emmett Chapman (inventor of the Stick) told me once
he's found that the Stick is such a new instrument,
first time listeners usually approach it free of any
preconceptions. If you were to pull out something
more conventional, like a violin at a high school, or
a bright red electric guitar at a retirement home people
may shy away without even listening because they may
assume the music will be something they don't like.
The Stick is free from all that because nobody knows
what to expect. And fortunately for me, what I do with
it seems to keep most new listeners interested.
As far as hard sales data, the only thing I've seen
to date from Spotted Peccary has been digital download
numbers from iTunes. So far, in everything I've seen
its been Spotted Peccary's top album there since its
release.
AV:
You have taken this music on the road quite a
bit. Tell me about some of your more successful performances
of this new music and how far and wide you've traveled
to perform it.
TG: Since the album was released
about eleven months ago, I've actually done probably
about 150 or more shows. Last fall I did about 40 dates
as opener and guest with the California Guitar Trio.
We put about 15,000 miles on a rental van, heading through
about 37 states. Since then Jerry Marotta and I have
done several short tours as a duo including two trips
up the west coast from San Diego to Vancouver, a few
dates on the east coast and a trip to Italy and France.
In between all of that I've kept pretty busy doing
solo shows regionally in Southern California and duo
shows with drummer Darren DeBree.
It's always a thrill for me to do the tours with
Jerry. The two of us give probably the best rendition
of this music live that can be given. On a few occasions,
we've managed to line up our schedule with CGT's and
do shows together as well. Jerry and I usually sit in
with them then and Bert Lams from the trio has sat in
with us as well.
That combination of CGT plus Jerry and myself is
easily some of the most fun I've ever had being a musician.
Actually on a few occasions, Tony Levin was also touring
with the trio so we had a sextet on stage of CGT, Jerry,
Tony and Tom. Totally amazing. I walk away from shows
like that just thinking.. "This is why I'm in music...
I wish every show was like this!"
AV:
I've noticed that many of your live performances
listed on your website is as an opening act for quite
a number of well known jazz acts. Do you see your music
falling more in line with that genre of music or does
it have some cross genre appeal to it?
TG: Actually the opening act
spots have been a sort of microcosm of where my music
lands stylistically and also in a sense where it comes
from.
I probably get paired up mainly with progressive
rock people, but also jazz acts and even some jam band
groups. I've been quite fortunate to be able to share
the stage with almost a who's who of each genre. On
the progressive rock side, that's included people like
CGT, The Tony Levin Band, Bill Bruford's Earthworks,
Asia, Adrian Belew, Steve Hackett and the Dixie Dregs.
More on the jazz side it's included people like Al Dimeola,
Stanley Jordan, Larry Carlton and Steve Lukather, Tower
of Power and Jazz Mandolin Project. All of those
shows were great and I usually seemed to find something
a little similar to what I do in all of them, and always
come away from them feeling re-inspired in some way.
AV:
Is it difficult to reproduce the sound that you
create in the studio out on the road? Do you believe
in the exact reproduction of a recorded piece of music
while you are on the road or do you have more of an
improvisational jazz mentality about the music that
it becomes a unique performance each time you play it
live?
TG: I definitely don't try for
exact reproductions. To me as a listener, I can actually
get a bit bored if things are exactly like an album
I know well. But having said that, I also don't feel
every piece needs to be completely different every time
either. I think as I described earlier I seem to have
an approach whereby pieces are just allowed to evolve
over time. Sometimes I may get them to a point where
it feels like the initial ideas have been flushed out
about as well as they can be. At that point, a piece
might stay largely the same from night to night while
at the same time other pieces are continuing to change
and grow from show to show.
I also feel like recording is just a very different
art form than live performance. A live audience has
the benefit of seeing how the music is made which in
the case of a Chapman Stick is a bit interesting all
on its own. There can be so much coming from a Stick
with bass lines, chords and melodies happening simultaneously
that there really is something of a "show"
to it, almost like watching some sort of Cirque De Soleil
(sp?) performer. On an album though you loose that element,
not to mention things like the ambient sounds in the
venue, direct contact with a performer, the group dynamic
of the crowd and so on. A recording studio is
a much more sterile environment than a venue. A piece
that may feel full and complete in a live setting can
sometimes feel empty if it's recorded exactly as it's
performed. Likewise something that has been worked with
extensively in a studio and has a lot of nuances and
depth to it in a recording can sometimes sound overproduced
or contrived live. So to me it's always a goal try to
listen anew to the music I'm making and to be aware
of how it's interacting with whatever environment it's
in. From there I just try to make it the best
it can be for that setting.
One great example from the album is the middle section
of Victor's Chase. There is a key change where the piece
goes from minor to major. Live, my left hand plays a
low bass pattern and a chord above it, while the right
plays some melodic figures. Victor's is a very long
piece though. I realized when it came to this section
that for the sake of the recorded version, it might
be nice to really get away from the Stick for awhile,
so.. the low bass and chord pattern my left hand does
on Stick, got broken out into parts, with myself playing
the bass notes on a fretless bass and one of the guitarists
in CGT playing the chord part. Likewise when the piece
returns to the "A" section I substituted the
fretless bass for the Stick on part of the theme. Little
ideas like this throughout the album really helped add
a nice extra "layer" to it I think, but live
I don't miss those instruments because the parts are
all present anyways and with a "show" going
on, I don't think there is as much of a need for that
type of variety.
AV:
Do you ever miss playing the guitar? Have you
completely replaced the guitar with the Chapman Stick
in your performances and in your recordings or do you
still plan on including the guitar in your line up from
time to time?
TG: I do miss the guitar, but
I also still play it some. My shows to date have revolved
around the Stick though for some time, simply because
it's such a great instrument for creating a full sounding
piece live.
Unlike a lot of artists in the ambient or "new
age" genre, I don't do any sequencing live or use
any backing tracks, other than loops I record on the
fly. The day may come when the music I create will require
me to go down that path in shows, but so far I haven't
needed to, and I'm a bit glad for it. I've seen a few
Stick players play with backing tracks, and it always
seems to diminish the show somewhat even if it adds
to the overall orchestration. A Stick player could be
playing three parts simultaneously, but if there is
a fourth part that's sequenced I find myself feeling
sometimes like maybe some of the other parts aren't
live either and somehow it can take away from the impressiveness
of the performance, even though it's maybe making the
music richer.
That said, the guitar is still a great instrument
to me. In many ways it's more expressive than the Stick.
There are many times I wish I could so something as
simple as a palm mute on the Stick live, but when both
hands are tapping away, there are no free palms! But
on recordings, including AWITT I did use guitars for
a few parts, and some 5 string basses as well which
I've been playing more and more of these days.
AV:
Do you still get some strange looks when you start
to play the Chapman Stick in concert from those in the
audience who haven't seen it played before or
has it become just a little more commonplace in the
last few years?
TG: You "always" get
looks and questions as a Stick player. It's kind of
a running joke in the Stick community. What amazes me
most is that in my hometown of San Diego, there is an
event here I've played at literally 200 times now, with
hundreds if not thousands of people passing by each
time. Incredible exposure, and I would like to think
that after all of that in one city, the majority of
the people in that area might know what it is. But..
not so.. I'd guess that maybe only one in ten people
who go to that event now know what it is.
AV:
A Whisper in the Thunder came out in October of
last year, have you been working on a follow up to this
CD? Any hints on the direction it will take you or when
you are thinking of releasing it?
TG: I actually have another release
in "the can" so to speak. Jerry Marotta and
I have recorded a "band" album that will be
out sometime next year. It's called Waking the Day by
Marotta/Griesgraber and as the name implies shares the
title track in common with AWITT but a new recording
and arrangement of it. We're still talking to labels
at this poing, but I think we've got it figured out
as to what we're going to do now.
Overall the Marotta/Griesgraber album is a bit denser
in orchestration than AWITT. On AWITT you get some flavor
of what Jerry is all about, but on the MG CD its really
more of an even partnership between us. Drums play a
major role in it, and frankly though I've probably listened
to all of the major recordings Jerry is best known for,
I've never heard him do anything quite like this before.
There are a few tracks where we both went pretty wild
adding different parts. I think the most extreme example
finds Jerry doing interlocking parts on two or three
full drum kits, some hand percussion, an electronic
drum kit and a few passes with his Taos drum kit. I
wound up using the Stick in a similar fashion, really
exploring it as if it were multiple single instruments
rather than one multi-instrument. Once we had
most of our parts together we also invited a great keyboard
player named Harvey Jones (Chris Botti) to add some
tracks as well as bassist Tony Levin (Peter Gabriel,
King Crimson).
AV:
For the rest of this year and into 2006 where
can folks catch you live in concert? Do you have
a place on your website that lists your concert appearances?
TG: In Southern California, I've
got shows coming up in October with Adrian Belew and
Steve Hackett. Sandwiched between those, Marotta/ Griesgraber
will be opening for the Tony Levin Band in Italy and
Switzerland. In November, Marotta/Griesgraber goes back
to Italy, Switzerland and possibly France on our own
headlining trip.
My website has a page with all the updated info (http://www.thossounds.com/schedules.html
) I also keep an e-mail list and send out updates
maybe twice a month as to what's going on. There is
a subscription page on the website as well.
AV:
Finally to finish things up, is there anything
else that you would like to share with the readers of
Ambient Visions about your music and where you would
like to see it take you in the coming years?
TG: I would love to share exactly
where I see my music taking me, but frankly I can't
really say where that will be! The thing that
keeps me in the game of music is really writing.
That's the most fascinating part to me, and I always
feel a need to keep looking for things I haven't done
yet. New rhythms, new chords, new sounds and so on.
I have several new concepts for albums in mind and frankly
I hope to get to them all as soon as humanly (or otherwise)
possible.
AV:
Tom, it has been a pleasure talking to you about
your music and especially your new CD A Whisper in the
Thunder. You have created some wonderful compositions
on this CD and has been gracing my sound system quite
a bit as of late. I wish you much success with your
music and I am looking forward to whatever you release
over the coming years. I'm sure it will be great. Thanks
again for letting Ambient Visions be a small part of
it.
|